Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Government ICT spend swells to $5 billion

Federal government spending on ICT has shot up 20 percent over the last 12 to 18 months, with special Minister of State Senator Eric Abetz revealing it is now "investing" around $5 billion a year on the technology sector.

Speaking today at the launch of the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) Guide to open source software at the Open Computing in Government conference in Canberra, Abetz said "the government's annual investment in ICT is in the vicinity of $5 billion a year. Of this, between 15 and 20 percent is new spending.

The figure constitutes a rise of around $1 billion from the previously held Department of Finance ICT spending estimate of between $4.0 billion and $4.2 billion a year and underscores Canberra's position as the single biggest IT spender in Australia.

True to form, Abetz again used the opportunity to reiterate his stated position that the federal government will not be taken for a taxpayer-subsidized ride by vendors seeking to inveigle agencies into contractual lock-ins by reducing up-front costs.

To this end, Abetz cited what is increasingly sounding like a new government procurement doctrine in the form of "informed neutrality" whereby agencies are firmly encouraged by AGIMO best practice guidelines to think outside of purely proprietary procurement models .

"In looking at value, agencies need to consider the total cost of ownership over the life of the software, not just the up-front cost. These principles apply to all software purchasing decisions, whether proprietary or open source.

"The government's approach therefore is one of informed neutrality. It allows open source and proprietary software to operate in a neutral, competitive environment," he said.

This includes the government developing its own solutions and software based on non-proprietary code bases - including the retention of intellectual property - where such solutions provide the best value for money.

Computerworld is currently seeking comment from federal shadow IT spokesman Stephen Conroy, and Microsoft.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: HIS Limited, INS, Microsoft, Vicinity

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Look both ways - Protecting your data with content inspection
    Today’s threat environment is as dynamic as the business world in which we operate. As the communications channels we use continue to proliferate and evolve, so too have the vulnerabilities. Finding the right balance between ensuring the security of sensitive data, enabling the free flow of information and making full use of the latest web-based technologies can be a challenge. Deep content inspection is a vital layer in any unified information security strategy, helping organisations to take control over their information assets while proactively protecting against malware and data leakage. Read on.
    Learn more »
  • Seven Ways Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) Makes Your Supply Chain More Efficient
    webMethods Optimize for B2B offers a set of technology capabilities commonly described as Business Activity Monitoring (BAM). To appreciate the value of Optimize and how it operates in conjunction with webMethods Trading Networks, it is helpful to understand the basic concepts behind BAM and how the technology is applied in a business setting. Read on.
    Learn more »
  • The State of Privacy & Data Security Compliance
    With the plethora of new privacy and data security regulations, we believe it is time to ask whether regulations help or hinder an organization’s ability not only to protect sensitive and confidential information assets, but to be competitive in the global marketplace. Further, how difficult is it to be in compliance, who is the typical person or functional leader accountable for compliance? What is the value to the organization? Finally, what differences (if any) exist in security practices between compliant and non-compliant organizations?
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments